Ann Coulter | StaunchUSA

Anti-Gay Group wants Ann Coulter to Skip Gay Event

On August 11, 2010, in Celebrity, Political, by admin

Peter LaBarbera, the president of the local anti-gay group Americans for the Truth About Homosexuality ( AFTAH ) , wants controversial right-wing pundit Ann Coulter to reconsider her appearance at HOMOCON 2010, a Sept. 25 event in New York City organized by the gay conservative group GOProud, according to the AFTAH website.

LaBarbera said, “As a fan of Ann Coulter, it pains me to see her cave in to political correctness and lend credibility to the phony homosexual ‘conservatives’ over at GOProud. Worse, Coulter is sending a dangerous message to young Americans that homosexuality is OK.”

Regarding the HOMOCON appearance, Coulter said, “I’m thrilled to be giving a speech to a room full of gay conservatives, because according to every single liberal I’ve ever met, such people don’t even exist! Who’s next on my speaking tour? Conservative unicorns? ( And don’t kid yourself—they’re out there. I get letters from them all the time. ) ,” according to GOProud.org.

Its website also states that “GOProud is committed to a traditional conservative agenda that emphasizes limited government, individual liberty, free markets and a confident foreign policy. GOProud promotes our traditional conservative agenda by influencing politics and policy at the federal level.”

Thanks Windy City Media Group.

Ann Coulter No Longer Relevant?

On June 22, 2010, in Political, by admin

Remember Ann Coulter? Seems like just yesterday she was Queen of the Right, the whole political world hanging on her every bile-laced tirade. Yet she’s all but disappeared.

Not that she isn’t trying. She’s still got her weekly column over at Human Events (latest entry: “Alvin Greene: The Most Qualified Democrat I Have Ever Seen” – Har har!). She still makes regular appearances on Fox, showing up to gab with Bill O’Reilly or Sean Hannity. But she seems to have completely lost her ability to move from the right-wing outlets into the mainstream discussion.

So what happened? First, her shtick just got old. “Ann Coulter said something offensive!” could only be big news so many times. After a while, it seemed like she was just trying to be outrageous for the sake of outrageousness. I’ll attack 9/11 widows! I’ll call Al Gore “a total fag”! Aren’t I outrageous! Look at me!!! After a while it ceased to be interesting.

But something else happened. These are boom times for the right. Certain political sectors thrive when their side is out of power, and commentary is one of them. Being on the outside, and being angry at those on the inside, can be invigorating. That’s why subscriptions to liberal magazines tend to go up when there’s a Republican in the White House, and subscriptions to conservative magazines go up when there’s a Democrat in the White House. But even though Barack Obama should have been great for Coulter, Inc., the right wing has passed her by. Her act seems somehow out of place. It’s not that there isn’t plenty of hate on the right, but Coulter’s hate was just pure venom, without much point to it. She had none of the crazy conspiracy theories that have become de rigueur. She shot out in all directions, while the people at the top of the heap now, like Glenn Beck, are convinced they are driven by a complex and coherent ideology, complete with a Founding Father fetishism that would sound insincere coming from Coulter.

So she’s been left behind, never to grace the cover of a national newsmagazine again. Tragic.

Thanks the American Prospect.

Tagged with: Al Gore • Ann Coulter • Bill O'Reilly • fag • glen beck • Human Events • right • sean hannity

Ann Coulter Wants/Needs Sarah Palin’s Help?

On June 13, 2010, in Political, by admin

At Human Events, Ann Coulter has implored Sarah Palin to endorse Rob Simmons for the GOP Connecticut Primary. Simmons has not only stopped campaigning, he is also a Republican moderate:

Sarah Palin endorsed three dark-horse candidates in Republican match-ups this year, and all three won their primaries yesterday: Nikki Haley in South Carolina, Sharron Angle in Nevada and Carly Fiorina in California. No wonder Sarah’s being stalked by Joe McGinniss.

Now, she’s got to endorse Rob Simmons for U.S. Senate. Otherwise, Republicans can kiss the possibility of a major upset in Connecticut goodbye.

I wouldn’t ask, but the country is at stake. We have a mere 100 senators; only 17 Senate seats currently held by Democrats are up this year; and only about six of those could possibly go Republican, even in Newt Gingrich’s wildest fantasies.

Thanks Frum Forum.

Tagged with: Ann Coulter • Connecticut • Democrats • GOP • newt gingrich • Republican • rob simmons • Sarah Palin • Senate

Ann Coulter on Karl Rove Tome: “Not at the Top of my Reading List”

On March 9, 2010, in Political, by admin

Conservative commentator Ann Coulter appeared on “The Joy Behar Show” on CNN Headline News to talk about, among other things, the new book by Karl Rove. Coulter said the book by the former top advisor to ex-President George W. Bush would be an interesting read, but it’s not at the top of her reading list.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuTY6MXxS5k

Tagged with: Ann Coulter • book • cnn headline news • Conservative • George Bush • Joy Behar • Karl Rove • reading list

Ann Coulter Writes on Iran and Talks on CPAC

On February 24, 2010, in Celebrity, Political, by admin

The only man causing President Obama more headaches than Joe Biden these days is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (who, coincidentally, was right after Biden on Obama’s short-list for V.P.).

Despite Obama’s personal magnetism, the Iranian president persists in moving like gangbusters to build nuclear weapons, leading to Ahmadinejad’s announcement last week that Iran is now a “nuclear state.”

Gee, that’s weird — because I remember being told in December 2007 that all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies had concluded that Iran had ceased nuclear weapons development as of 2003.

At the time of that leak, many of us recalled that the U.S. has the worst intelligence-gathering operations in the world. The Czechs, the French, the Italians — even the Iraqis (who were trained by the Soviets) — all have better intelligence.

Burkina Faso has better intelligence — and their director of intelligence is a witch doctor. The marketing division of Wal-Mart has more reliable intel than the U.S. government does.

After Watergate, the off-the-charts left-wing Congress gleefully set about dismantling this nation’s intelligence operations on the theory that Watergate never would have happened if only there had been no CIA.

Ron Dellums, a typical Democrat of the time, who — amazingly — was a member of the House Select Committee on Intelligence and chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, famously declared in 1975: “We should totally dismantle every intelligence agency in this country piece by piece, brick by brick, nail by nail.”

And so they did.

So now, our “spies” are prohibited from spying. The only job of a CIA officer these days is to read foreign newspapers and leak classified information to The New York Times. It’s like a secret society of newspaper readers. The reason no one at the CIA saw 9/11 coming was that there wasn’t anything about it in the Islamabad Post.

(On the plus side, at least we haven’t had another break-in at the Watergate.)

CIA agents can’t spy because that might require them to break laws in foreign countries. They are perfectly willing to break U.S. laws to leak to The New York Times, but not in order to acquire valuable intelligence.

So it was curious that after months of warnings from the Bush administration in 2007 that Iran was pursuing a nuclear weapons program, a National Intelligence Estimate on Iran was leaked, concluding that Iran had ceased its nuclear weapons program years earlier.

Republicans outside of the administration went ballistic over the suspicious timing and content of the Iran-Is-Peachy report. Even The New York Times, of all places, ran a column by two outside experts on Iran’s nuclear programs that ridiculed the NIE’s conclusion.

Gary Milhollin of the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control and Valerie Lincy of Iranwatch.org cited Iran’s operation of 3,000 gas centrifuges at its plant at Natanz, as well as a heavy-water reactor being built at Arak, neither of which had any peaceful energy purpose. (If only there were something plentiful in Iran that could be used for energy!)

Weirdly, our intelligence agencies missed those nuclear operations. They were too busy reading an article in the Tehran Tattler, “Iran Now Loves Israel.”

Ahmadinejad was ecstatic, calling the NIE report “a declaration of the Iranian people’s victory against the great powers.”

The only people more triumphant than Ahmadinejad about the absurd conclusion of our vaunted “intelligence” agencies were liberals.

In Time magazine, Joe Klein gloated that the Iran report “appeared to shatter the last shreds of credibility of the White House’s bomb-Iran brigade — and especially that of Vice President Dick Cheney.”

Liberal columnist Bill Press said, “No matter how badly Bush and Cheney wanted to carpet-bomb Iran, it’s clear now that doing so would have been a tragic mistake.”

Naturally, the most hysterical response came from MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann. After donning his mother’s housecoat, undergarments and fuzzy slippers, Keith brandished the NIE report, night after night, demanding that Bush apologize to the Iranians.

“Having accused Iran of doing something it had stopped doing more than four years ago,” Olbermann thundered, “instead of apologizing or giving a diplomatic response of any kind, this president of the United States chuckled.”

Olbermann ferociously defended innocent-as-a-lamb Mahmoud from aspersions cast by the Bush administration, asking: “Could Mr. Bush make it any more of a mess … in response to Iran’s anger at being in some respects, at least, either overrated or smeared, his response officially chuckling, how is that going to help anything?”

Bush had “smeared” Iran!

Olbermann’s Ed McMahon, the ever-obliging Howard Fineman of Newsweek, agreed, saying that the leaked intelligence showed that Bush “has zero credibility.”

Olbermann’s even creepier sidekick, androgynous Newsweek reporter Richard Wolffe, also agreed, saying American credibility “has suffered another serious blow.”

Poor Iran!

Olbermann’s most macho guest, Rachel Maddow, demanded to know — with delightful originality — “what the president knew and when he knew it.” This was on account of Bush’s having disparaged the good name of a messianic, Holocaust-denying nutcase, despite the existence of a cheery report on Iran produced by our useless intelligence agencies.

Olbermann, who knows everything that’s on the Daily Kos and nothing else, called those who doubted the NIE report “liars” and repeatedly demanded an investigation into when Bush knew about the NIE’s laughable report.

Even if you weren’t aware that the U.S. has the worst intelligence in the world, and even if you didn’t notice that the leak was timed perfectly to embarrass Bush, wouldn’t any normal person be suspicious of a report concluding Ahmadinejad was behaving like a prince?

Not liberals. Our intelligence agencies concluded Iran had suspended its nuclear program in 2003, so Bush owed Ahmadinejad an apology.

Feb. 11, 2010: Ahmadinejad announces that Iran is now a nuclear power.

Thanks, liberals!

Thanks www.anncoulter.com

Please visit Ann. Great website!

Tagged with: Ann Coulter • Bush • CIA • czech • French • Iran • italians • Joe Biden • Mahmoud Ahmadinejad • New York • New York Times • nie • Nuclear • President • Republicans • soviets • US • Watergate • White House

Ann Coulter, “THAT OLD OBAMA MAGIC IS BACK!”

On January 25, 2010, in Celebrity, Political, by admin

Once again, the people have spoken, and this time they quoted what Dick Cheney said to Pat Leahy.

Less than two weeks ago, The New York Times said that so much as a “tighter-than-expected” victory for Massachusetts Democratic Senate candidate Martha Coakley would incite “soul-searching among Democrats nationally,” which sent Times readers scurrying to their dictionaries to look up this strange new word, “soul.”

A close win for Coakley, the Times said, would constitute “the first real barometer of whether problems facing the party” will affect the 2010 elections.

But when Coakley actually lost the election by an astounding 5 points, the Chicago boys in the White House decided it was the chick’s fault.

Democratic candidate Martha Coakley may be a moral monster, but it’s ridiculous to blame her for losing the election. She lost because of the Democrats’ obsession with forcing national health care down the nation’s throat.

Coakley campaigned exactly the way she should have.

As a Democrat running in a special election for a seat that had been held by a Democratic icon (and another moral monster) for the past 46 years in a state with only 12 percent registered Republicans, Coakley’s objective was to have voters reading the paper on Friday, saying: “Hey, honey, did you know there was a special election four days ago? Yeah, apparently Coakley won, though it was a pretty low turnout.”

Ideally, no one except members of government unions and Coakley’s immediate family would have even been aware of the election.

And until Matt Drudge began covering it like a presidential election a week ago, it might have turned out that way.

Coakley had already won two statewide elections, while her Republican opponent, Scott Brown, had only won elections in his district. She had endorsements from the Kennedy family and the current appointed Democratic senator, Paul Kirk — as well as endless glowing profiles in The Boston Globe.

And by the way, as of Jan. 1, Brown had spent $642,000 on the race, while Coakley had spent $2 million.

On Jan. 8, just 11 days before the election, The New York Times reported: “A Brown win remains improbable, given that Democrats outnumber Republicans by 3 to 1 in the state and that Ms. Coakley, the state’s attorney general, has far more name recognition, money and organizational support.”

It was in that article that the Times said a narrow Coakley win would be an augury for the entire Democratic Party. But now she’s being hung out to dry so that Democrats don’t have to face the possibility that Obama’s left-wing policies are to blame.

Alternatively, Democrats are trying to write off Brown’s colossal victory as the standard seesawing of public sentiment that hits both Republicans and Democrats from time to time. As MSNBC’s Chris Matthews explained, it was just the voters saying “no” generally, but not to anything in particular.

Except when Republicans win political power, they hold onto it long enough to govern. The Democrats keep being smacked down by the voters immediately after being elected and revealing their heinous agenda.

As a result, for the past four decades, American politics has consisted of Republicans controlling Washington for eight to 14 years — either from the White House or Capitol Hill — thus allowing Americans to forget what it was they didn’t like about Democrats, whom they then carelessly vote back in. The Democrats immediately remind Americans what they didn’t like about Democrats, and their power is revoked at the voters’ first possible opportunity.

Obama has cut the remembering-what-we-don’t-like-about-Democrats stage of this process down from two to four years to about 10 months. Folks, I’m convinced that if we all work really hard, we can get it down to three months.

Four years of Jimmy Carter gave us two titanic Reagan landslides, peace and prosperity for eight blessed years — and even a third term for his feckless vice president, George H.W. Bush.

Two years of Bill Clinton gave us a historic Republican sweep of Congress, which killed the entire Clinton agenda (with the exception of partial-birth abortion and felony obstruction of justice) — and also gave us two terms for George W. Bush.

And now, merely one year of Obama and a Democratic Congress has given us the first Republican senator from Massachusetts in 31 years.

In other recent news, last November, New Jersey voters, who haven’t voted for a Republican for president since 1988, threw out their incumbent Democratic governor, Jon Corzine. In Virginia, which Obama carried by 6 points a year earlier, a religious-right Republican won the governor’s office by 17 points.

Sen. Ben Nelson, Democrat of Nebraska, won his last election in 2006 by 28 points — the largest margin for a Democratic Senate candidate in that state in a quarter-century.

Since voting for the Senate health care bill last Christmas, the once-bulletproof Sen. Nelson not only gets booed out of Omaha pizzerias, but he has also seen his job approval rating fall to 42 percent and his disapproval rating soar to 48 percent. (Meanwhile, the junior senator from Nebraska, Mike Johanns, who voted against the bill, has a job approval rating of 63 percent.)

The Democrats have no natural majority because they have no fundamental principles — at least none that they are willing to state out loud. They are like a drunken vagrant who emerges from the alley to cause havoc every few years. They are the perpetual toothache of American politics.

To be sure, the fact that 52 percent of Massachusetts voters are racist, sexist tea-baggers — i.e., voted for a Republican — means only that the Democrats just went from having the largest congressional majority in a generation to the second largest. But this was “Teddy Kennedy’s seat.” And it was in Massachusetts.

Now, no Democrat is safe.

But the country just got a lot safer.

Please head over to anncoulter.com… Great!

Thanks AnnCoulter.com

Tagged with: Ann Coulter • Chicago • Democratic • Dick Cheney • election • Kennedy • martha coakley • Massachusetts • Matt Drudge • New York Times • obession • pat leahy • Presidential • Senate • soul • union

New Ann Coulter Article Up! Health Care

On September 3, 2009, in Celebrity, Political, by admin

Hey — I have an idea: How about we make everyone in America a multimillionaire by pulling Bernie Madoff out of prison and asking him to invest all our money! Both Medicare and Bernie Madoff’s investment portfolio are bankrupt because they operate on a similar financial model known as a “Ponzi scheme.” These always seem to run fabulously well — until the money runs out.

Not only is Medicare bankrupt, but it is extremely limited in whom and what it covers. If Medicare were a private insurer, it would be illegal in many states for failing to cover hearing aids, podiatry, acupuncture, chiropractic care, marriage counseling, aromatherapy and gender reassignment surgery.

Moreover, Medicare payments aren’t enough to pay the true cost of those medical services it does cover. With Medicare undercutting payments to hospitals and doctors for patients 65 and older, what keeps the American medical system afloat are private individuals who are not covered by Medicare paying full freight (and then some). That’s why you end up with a $10 aspirin on your hospital bill.
to continue reading please click on the link below…

www.anncoulter.com

Tagged with: America • Ann Coulter • Bernie Madoff • hospital • medicare • ponzi

New Ann Coulter Article

On August 12, 2009, in Political, by admin

Another fun article from Ann Coulter:

Tardy though they are, we welcome MSNBC to finally joining every major conservative news outlet — including Fox News, The American Spectator, Human Events, National Review and Sweetness & Light — in discrediting the idea that President Obama wasn’t born in this country and, therefore, is ineligible to be president.

Now the big question: Was Joe Biden born on this planet?

Inasmuch as the “birther” movement was hatched in the station wagon of MSNBC’s favorite left-wing fantasist, Larry Johnson, maybe the mainstream media can stop acting as if it’s a creation of the Republican National Committee.

Which party contains 99 percent of the people who believe (or believed):

Continue reading at:

www.anncoulter.com

Tagged with: American Spectator • Ann Coulter • Conservative • Fox News • Human Events • Joe Biden • MSNBC • National Review • Obama • Republican

New Commentary about Barbara Walters up at Examiner.com. Please Read and Comment!

On August 5, 2009, in Celebrity, TV/Reality, by admin

Commentary: You got to love Glenn Beck for causing such an ire among the radical elite, especially Barbara Walters. He used tactics made popular by Liberals who shout and hiss to get their point across or in hilarious cases sick the ACLU on you if you mention Charlton Heston. One must wonder will Harry Reasoner get the last laugh? Antiqued Barbara Walters decided to take a biased view for the umpteenth time against Fox News and its commentators. (Hanging around with Nancy Pelosi and her doctors isn’t a great influence for the face Ms. Walters.)

It is a well known fact that in the news world, commentators are free to opine but when you are a “supposed” journalist there is a code of ethics. A code of impartiality. Ms. Walters broke this code long ago with the hiring of Rosie O’Donnell and now with Whoopi Goldberg. It’s funny when you long for the un-slanted days of Meredith Vieira. …

To continue reading click here:

http://www.examiner.com/x-19232-Manhattan-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m8d5-The-vintage-point-of-The-View

Tagged with: ACLU • Ann Coulter • Barbara Walters • Charlton Heston • Examiner.com • Fox News • Glenn Beck • Harry Reasoner • Nancy Pelosi • Rosie O'Donnell

Ann Coulter on Obama’s Sliding Poll Numbers

On July 22, 2009, in Political, by admin

This is a rush transcript from “Hannity,” July 21, 2009. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

SEAN HANNITY, HOST: And tonight in “Your America” it appears that many Americans have seen all the change that they can handle from President Obama. New polls are showing that the electorate has now turned on the anointed one.

In fact, the president’s average approval rating in the second quarter in office is now actually lower than Jimmy Carter’s numbers were at this time in the same time in his presidency.

Another survey from Public Strategies and Politico shows only 54 percent of those polls say they trust Obama, and that is a drop of 12 points in just a few months, and the news for the president’s party is not much better, only 42 percent of those polled now say that they trust the Democratic Party.

Joining us now is the author of the New York Times best seller, “Guilty: Liberals, Victims, and Their Assault on America.”

Ann Coulter, good to see you in New York. How are you?

ANN COULTER, AUTHOR & COLUMNIST: Fine, thanks. How are you?

HANNITY: You’re going to have to pay taxes for this appearance tonight.

(LAUGHTER)

HANNITY: Well, first of all, this is new ground, eight out of ten issues.

COULTER: Right.

HANNITY: This is a big change. Eight out of ten — the big issues facing this country now, Republicans are in the lead over the Democrats.

COULTER: Right. Right. It’s not that big a change. I mean historically this has been the pattern, certainly in my lifetime, which is to say since the Republican party has been the conservative party and the Democratic Party has been the liberal party, which happens always been the case.

• Great American Blog: Have you lost trust in Obama?

What happens is, Americans are more conservative than liberal, as polls also show they vote in Republicans after eight or 12 years. For one thing, Republicans get sloppy and start doing their own big government stuff, and also Americans think how bad can the Democrats be?

So they put a Democrat in, and they remember how bad the Democrats can be.

HANNITY: Yes. That’s true.

COULTER: You get one term or you get two years with Bill Clinton and then suddenly for the next six years Clinton is, you know, signing everything Newt Gingrich and the Republican Congress was sending to him. A major Republican takeover after that.

And — I mean you’ve seen this pattern going back basically since LBJ. You’ll get eight or 12 years of Republican, one term or even two years of a Democrat government, I’ll say, and that what — of course you’re going to see it here.

HANNITY: He’s running, though — and this is the first time he’s really hit trouble. And.

COULTER: Yes.

(LAUGHTER)

HANNITY: Well, this is the first — Americans are saying he’s spending too much money. Americans now blame him for the economy.

COULTER: Right.

HANNITY: Americans are more conservative than liberal.

COULTER: Don’t trust him.

HANNITY: They don’t trust him.

COULTER: And they shouldn’t. I mean as you keep pointing out.

HANNITY: But he’s becoming is unhinged.

COULTER: Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.

HANNITY: Thank you.

COULTER: Look at his press conference today, if you can play that without him even speaking, and we knew this was going to happen. This guy can’t take one punch. No, when he starts talking, not just standing. You can see he is becoming.

HANNITY: But we can’t — you’re talking, Coulter, so we wouldn’t want to interrupt you.

COULTER: Yes, the walking shots aren’t that good.

HANNITY: Yes.

COULTER: You can see he’s becoming unhinged because the media has totally, totally built this guy up, he can’t do anything — the fist bump you just did to me, it was if he had invented the cure for cancer when he did that with his wife. He swats a fly, and they’re all, you know, hyperventilating.

Now, meanwhile, look how he acted to his critics, to you, to Rush Limbaugh. He lashes out at Rush Limbaugh and tells Democrats don’t listen to this guy. You can’t imagine George Bush attacking Dan Rather.

HANNITY: You were very jealous that he wasn’t attacking you anymore.

COULTER: He did attack me in his first book.

HANNITY: Attacked me and you together.

COULTER: That’s right. That’s right. I was very upset, but the point is, if this guy is so upset by criticism from people who are on the opposite side of the spectrum, what’s going to happen as these polls as inevitably will happen start to fall on him as Americans realize that oh, he really is a liberal, it’s not just a charming speech maker.

HANNITY: Why do you think it is that so many Americans put their faith in government? Why would they put their faith in Obama when every promise he made about the economy, about the stimulus, about job creation, every promise has now been broken, and now he is — it’s so bad he wants to hide the numbers from the American people?

COULTER: Right. Right. I mean that was an interesting thing, and one of the polls, one that was in Politico today.

(LAUGHTER)

It was something like 40 percent of Americans think that health care will be more expensive if we have a massive government takeover… 27 percent think it will be less expensive.

HANNITY: Yes. Who are they?

COULTER: Now, that’s who we’ve got to interview.

(LAUGHTER)

Who are these people? Less expensive?

HANNITY: Yes, well, they’re dreaming.

COULTER: But as you keep pointing out with Obama, he said we’ve got to pass this stimulus bill, otherwise unemployment is going to go up.

HANNITY: Yes.

COULTER: It’ll — we’re going to at least keep it, we’ll have it go down again, it could get as high as 8 percent, and now it’s 9.5 percent. Of course he’s losing credibility, and now he’s saying we have to pass this health care bill now. Of course, he’s losing credibility.

HANNITY: Let me ask you on the political front.

COULTER: And he’s saying — sorry, excuse, just let me finish this one point.

HANNITY: Go ahead.

COULTER: He is saying that money will go down.

HANNITY: Right.

COULTER: If you have a national takeover of the government. He is saying it won’t increase the deficit.

HANNITY: True.

COULTER: No one can believe that.

HANNITY: Everybody knows taxes are going to go up, rationing is going to be guaranteed.

COULTER: Right. Right.

HANNITY: Quality is going to decline, you know, we know all of this and most Americans are going to be forcing the government system.

COULTER: That’s right.

HANNITY: Everybody knows that. This is — all right. So the question, I guess, this now becomes political. There’s a poll out that came out this week, in that Mitt Romney.

COULTER: Right.

HANNITY: In a hypothetical matchup would tie Barack Obama and Governor Palin only a few points away.

COULTER: Right. Right.

HANNITY: How do you interpret that?

COULTER: I’ve noticed that in a lot of the polls that Romney is doing quite well. And I think Romney.

HANNITY: Are you supporting him?

COULTER: Possibly. I think we have to wait — or get out there a little bit faster the next time. And not wait until.

HANNITY: How about Governor Palin? You like Governor Palin.

COULTER: . the last minute when Republican primary voters go for the worst possible candidate, and then saying no, no, not him. But

HANNITY: But you voted for Governor Palin in the last election.

COULTER: I did vote for Palin, I loved Palin.

HANNITY: Yes.

COULTER: And I do think with Romney — I think it might — hard to make a prediction now.

HANNITY: And how about Newt Gingrich?

COULTER: It could well be Romney because — primary voters — Republican primary voters seem to vote for any name they’ve heard before which isn’t so good when the name they’ve heard before is McCain. It might be good with Romney.

But what Romney has to do, let me say quickly before you cut me off, he has to get out and explain what was wrong with the health care program he did in Massachusetts, he has to take control of this issue. Now is the time.

HANNITY: Last question. What about Newt?

COULTER: I don’t — I’d take Romney or Palin I think.

HANNITY: What about Jindal?

COULTER: I think Gingrich should be the talker in chief.

HANNITY: Talker because he’s smart. He’s bright.

COULTER: The talker.

HANNITY: All right. We’ll get to the bottom of this one day. All right. Thanks for being with us.

COULTER: Thank you.

Tagged with: Ann Coulter • Conservative • Democratic Party • Hannity • Jimmy Carter • Liberal • New York Times • Obama • Politico • Republicans

Ann Coulter’s New Column…

On July 19, 2009, in Political, by admin

My other favorite gal beside Hillary, Ann Coulter has a new article up. Here is a snipet with a link at the bottom for the remainder:

Every time a Democrat senator has talked during the Senate hearings on Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor this week, I felt lousy about my country. Not for the usual reasons when a Democrat talks, but because Democrats revel in telling us what a racist country this is.

Interestingly, the Democrats’ examples of ethnic prejudice did not include Clarence Thomas, whose nomination hearings began with the Democrats saying, “You may now uncuff the defendant.”

Their examples did not include Miguel Estrada, the brilliant Harvard-educated lawyer who was blocked from an appellate court judgeship by Senate Democrats expressly on the grounds that he is a Hispanic — as stated in Democratic staff memos that became public.

www.anncoulter.com…. or click on links at main screen.

Tagged with: Ann Coulter • Clarence Thomas • Democrat • Hillary • Hispanic • Miguel Estrada • Senate • Sonia Sotomayor • Supreme Court

I Think Barbara Walters Should Retire! (VOD)

On July 15, 2009, in Celebrity, Political, TV/Reality, VOD, by admin

Here are a few videos… I can give you many but I picked these ones. She should be out out to pastor now.

Yelling at Elizabeth for giving her “View:”

Not letting guest defend herself (Ann Coulter):

Biased with Obama and McCain:

Tagged with: Ann Coulter • Barbara Walters • Elizabeth • McCain • Obama

Anti-Gay Group wants Ann Coulter to Skip Gay Event

Ann Coulter No Longer Relevant?

Ann Coulter Wants/Needs Sarah Palin’s Help?

Ann Coulter on Karl Rove Tome: “Not at the Top of my Reading List”

Ann Coulter Writes on Iran and Talks on CPAC

Ann Coulter, “THAT OLD OBAMA MAGIC IS BACK!”

New Ann Coulter Article Up! Health Care

New Ann Coulter Article

New Commentary about Barbara Walters up at Examiner.com. Please Read and Comment!

Ann Coulter on Obama’s Sliding Poll Numbers

Ann Coulter’s New Column…

I Think Barbara Walters Should Retire! (VOD)

Recent Comments

Categories

Looking for something?

Visit our friends!

Tags