Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, visiting Brazil to enlist support for tougher United Nations Security Council penalties on Iran over its suspected nuclear weapons program, said the U.S. believes Iran will only negotiate after sanctions are imposed.

“Once the international community speaks in unison around a resolution, then the Iranians will talk and begin to negotiate,” Clinton said during a press conference today in Brasilia after talks with Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim. “We want to get to negotiations; we just think that the best path is through the Security Council.”

Clinton said that while Brazil and the U.S. differ over whether sanctions are the best approach, both countries “do not want to see Iran become a nuclear weapons country.”

Brazil, which holds a temporary voting seat on the UN Security Council, backs Iran’s claim that its nuclear program is for energy and medical purposes, and has resisted a U.S. and European push to impose new penalties to squeeze Iranian commercial and financial transactions as a means to force Iran to the negotiating table.

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has cultivated trade and diplomatic ties with Iran, and is scheduled to visit Tehran in May.

Lula today reiterated his resistance to sanctions, telling reporters, “it’s not prudent to put Iran against a wall.” He said he would have “frank” talks with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad over Iran’s enrichment of uranium, and repeated that Iran has a right to a peaceful nuclear program.

Thanks Business Week.

[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Google] [Mister Wong] [MySpace] [Netvouz] [Newsvine] [OnlyWire] [Propeller] [Shoutwire] [Squidoo] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]

Photobucket


The only man causing President Obama more headaches than Joe Biden these days is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (who, coincidentally, was right after Biden on Obama’s short-list for V.P.).

Despite Obama’s personal magnetism, the Iranian president persists in moving like gangbusters to build nuclear weapons, leading to Ahmadinejad’s announcement last week that Iran is now a “nuclear state.”

Gee, that’s weird — because I remember being told in December 2007 that all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies had concluded that Iran had ceased nuclear weapons development as of 2003.

At the time of that leak, many of us recalled that the U.S. has the worst intelligence-gathering operations in the world. The Czechs, the French, the Italians — even the Iraqis (who were trained by the Soviets) — all have better intelligence.

Burkina Faso has better intelligence — and their director of intelligence is a witch doctor. The marketing division of Wal-Mart has more reliable intel than the U.S. government does.

After Watergate, the off-the-charts left-wing Congress gleefully set about dismantling this nation’s intelligence operations on the theory that Watergate never would have happened if only there had been no CIA.

Ron Dellums, a typical Democrat of the time, who — amazingly — was a member of the House Select Committee on Intelligence and chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, famously declared in 1975: “We should totally dismantle every intelligence agency in this country piece by piece, brick by brick, nail by nail.”

And so they did.

So now, our “spies” are prohibited from spying. The only job of a CIA officer these days is to read foreign newspapers and leak classified information to The New York Times. It’s like a secret society of newspaper readers. The reason no one at the CIA saw 9/11 coming was that there wasn’t anything about it in the Islamabad Post.

(On the plus side, at least we haven’t had another break-in at the Watergate.)

CIA agents can’t spy because that might require them to break laws in foreign countries. They are perfectly willing to break U.S. laws to leak to The New York Times, but not in order to acquire valuable intelligence.

So it was curious that after months of warnings from the Bush administration in 2007 that Iran was pursuing a nuclear weapons program, a National Intelligence Estimate on Iran was leaked, concluding that Iran had ceased its nuclear weapons program years earlier.

Republicans outside of the administration went ballistic over the suspicious timing and content of the Iran-Is-Peachy report. Even The New York Times, of all places, ran a column by two outside experts on Iran’s nuclear programs that ridiculed the NIE’s conclusion.

Gary Milhollin of the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control and Valerie Lincy of Iranwatch.org cited Iran’s operation of 3,000 gas centrifuges at its plant at Natanz, as well as a heavy-water reactor being built at Arak, neither of which had any peaceful energy purpose. (If only there were something plentiful in Iran that could be used for energy!)

Weirdly, our intelligence agencies missed those nuclear operations. They were too busy reading an article in the Tehran Tattler, “Iran Now Loves Israel.”

Ahmadinejad was ecstatic, calling the NIE report “a declaration of the Iranian people’s victory against the great powers.”

The only people more triumphant than Ahmadinejad about the absurd conclusion of our vaunted “intelligence” agencies were liberals.

In Time magazine, Joe Klein gloated that the Iran report “appeared to shatter the last shreds of credibility of the White House’s bomb-Iran brigade — and especially that of Vice President Dick Cheney.”

Liberal columnist Bill Press said, “No matter how badly Bush and Cheney wanted to carpet-bomb Iran, it’s clear now that doing so would have been a tragic mistake.”

Naturally, the most hysterical response came from MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann. After donning his mother’s housecoat, undergarments and fuzzy slippers, Keith brandished the NIE report, night after night, demanding that Bush apologize to the Iranians.

“Having accused Iran of doing something it had stopped doing more than four years ago,” Olbermann thundered, “instead of apologizing or giving a diplomatic response of any kind, this president of the United States chuckled.”

Olbermann ferociously defended innocent-as-a-lamb Mahmoud from aspersions cast by the Bush administration, asking: “Could Mr. Bush make it any more of a mess … in response to Iran’s anger at being in some respects, at least, either overrated or smeared, his response officially chuckling, how is that going to help anything?”

Bush had “smeared” Iran!

Olbermann’s Ed McMahon, the ever-obliging Howard Fineman of Newsweek, agreed, saying that the leaked intelligence showed that Bush “has zero credibility.”

Olbermann’s even creepier sidekick, androgynous Newsweek reporter Richard Wolffe, also agreed, saying American credibility “has suffered another serious blow.”

Poor Iran!

Olbermann’s most macho guest, Rachel Maddow, demanded to know — with delightful originality — “what the president knew and when he knew it.” This was on account of Bush’s having disparaged the good name of a messianic, Holocaust-denying nutcase, despite the existence of a cheery report on Iran produced by our useless intelligence agencies.

Olbermann, who knows everything that’s on the Daily Kos and nothing else, called those who doubted the NIE report “liars” and repeatedly demanded an investigation into when Bush knew about the NIE’s laughable report.

Even if you weren’t aware that the U.S. has the worst intelligence in the world, and even if you didn’t notice that the leak was timed perfectly to embarrass Bush, wouldn’t any normal person be suspicious of a report concluding Ahmadinejad was behaving like a prince?

Not liberals. Our intelligence agencies concluded Iran had suspended its nuclear program in 2003, so Bush owed Ahmadinejad an apology.

Feb. 11, 2010: Ahmadinejad announces that Iran is now a nuclear power.

Thanks, liberals!

Thanks www.anncoulter.com

Please visit Ann. Great website!

[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Google] [Mister Wong] [MySpace] [Netvouz] [Newsvine] [OnlyWire] [Propeller] [Shoutwire] [Squidoo] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]
Tagged with:
 

 

Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, has said Iran has left the international community little choice but to impose harsh penalties against it over its controversial nuclear programme.

Speaking at a US-Islamic World Forum in Doha, Qatar on Sunday, Clinton said there was mounting evidence that Iran was pursuing a nuclear weapon.

“The evidence is accumulating that that’s exactly what they are trying to do,” she said.

“Iran has consistently failed to live up to its responsibilities. It has refused to demonstrate to the international community that its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful.”

Clinton said the US and some of its allies were working on new measures to try and persuade Iran to change its course and reconsider its “dangerous policy decisions”.

‘Shift in rhetoric’

She also stressed that the administration of Barack Obama, the US president, wants a peaceful solution to the nuclear dispute, but she said that its patience would eventually reach a limit.

“I would like to figure out a way to handle it in as peaceful an approach as possible, and I certainly welcome any meaningful engagement, but … we don’t want to be engaging while they are building their bomb.”

Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, has said Iran has left the international community little choice but to impose harsh penalties against it over its controversial nuclear programme.

Speaking at a US-Islamic World Forum in Doha, Qatar on Sunday, Clinton said there was mounting evidence that Iran was pursuing a nuclear weapon.

 “The evidence is accumulating that that’s exactly what they are trying to do,” she said.

“Iran has consistently failed to live up to its responsibilities. It has refused to demonstrate to the international community that its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful.”

 Clinton said the US and some of its allies were working on new measures to try and persuade Iran to change its course and reconsider its “dangerous policy decisions”.

‘Shift in rhetoric’

She also stressed that the administration of Barack Obama, the US president, wants a peaceful solution to the nuclear dispute, but she said that its patience would eventually reach a limit.

“I would like to figure out a way to handle it in as peaceful an approach as possible, and I certainly welcome any meaningful engagement, but … we don’t want to be engaging while they are building their bomb.”

Asked what evidence the US had that Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons, PJ Crowley, the US state department spokesman, said that Washington was basing its assertions on Iran’s actions.

“Given the current trajectory that Iran is on – the fact that it still has centrifuges spinning, and the fact that it is unwilling to constructively engage the international community – we have to assume that Iran is pursuing a nuclear programme,” he told Al Jazeera.

“Given all the steps that Iran has taken and all the actions that Iran refuses to take, we can only begin to draw the conclusion that Iran’s intentions are less than peaceful.”

Nazanine Moshiri, Al Jazeera’s correspondent in the Iranian capital, Tehran, said Clinton’s assertion of evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapon programme indicates a shift in US rhetoric.
“Most Iranians will be quite surprised by that because a few days ago the White House said Iran wasn’t capable of reaching 20 per cent uranium enrichment,” she said.
 
“Iran has told Al Jazeera they are capable of producing nuclear weapons but they are not going to. They only want to enrich to 20 per cent for their Tehran reactor.”

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran’s president, said on Thursday that the country’s nuclear scientists had completed the further enrichment of the the first batch of its stockpile of uranium.

Tehran has said that it stepped up enrichment to produce fuel for a medical research reactor, but the US and its allies have said that the move signals a rejection of a UN-backed plan to swap Iran’s low-enriched uranium for processed nuclear fuel.

Iran has repeatedly stated that its nuclear programme is to meet the country’s civilian energy needs.

Middle East peace

Clinton’s comments at the forum, which is jointly organised by the Qatari foreign ministry and the US-based Brookings Institution, came only hours after she arrived in Doha for the start of a three-day visit to the region.

She is also using the trip to win Arab backing for the resumption of Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, a topic which she broached during her address.

“The goal of a comprehensive peace is fully in the interest of the United States. We are committed to our role in ensuring that negotiations begin and succeed,” she said.

“I know that people are disappointed that we have not yet achieved a breakthrough. The president … and I are disappointed as well.

“But we need to remember that neither the United States nor any country can force a solution. The parties must resolve their differences through negotiations.”

Marwan Bishara, Al Jazeera’s senior political analyst, said her remarks on the Israeli-Palestinian issue revealed nothing new about how the Obama administration would resolve the situation .
 
“There’s an attempt to address the Palestine-Israeli question without putting any responsibility on the occupying force, Israel, ” he said.
 
“We haven’t heard much new there.
 
“But while there is a sense that the secretary of state asks everyone to take responsibility for their actions, there is no taking responsibility for the US failure to revive the deadlocked peace process by not fulfilling its pledge to end the dispute over Israeli settlements.”

Clinton’s speech comes eight months after a similar address by Obama, who called for a new beginning in ties between the US and the Muslim world during a speech in Egypt in June.

The secretary of state on Sunday addressed concerns that Obama’s call during his speech was “insufficient and insincere”.

“Building a stronger relationship cannot happen overnight. It takes patience, persistence and hard work from all of us,” she said.

“We are and will remain committed to the president’s vision for a new beginning.”

Thanks Al Jazeera.

[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Google] [Mister Wong] [MySpace] [Netvouz] [Newsvine] [OnlyWire] [Propeller] [Shoutwire] [Squidoo] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]

Hundreds of thousands of Iranians massed Thursday in central Tehran to mark the anniversary of the revolution that created the country’s Islamic republic, while a heavy security force fanned out across the city and moved quickly to snuff out opposition counterprotests.

Police clashed with protesters in several sites around Tehran, firing tear gas to disperse them and paintballs to mark them for arrest. Dozens of hard-liners with batons and pepper spray attacked the convoy of a senior opposition leader, Mahdi Karroubi, smashing his car windows and forcing him to turn back as he tried to join the protests, his son Hossein Karroubi told The Associated Press.

The celebrations marking the revolution’s 31st anniversary were an opportunity for Iran’s clerical regime to tout its power in the face of the opposition movement, which has managed to keep up periodic street protests since the disputed June presidential elections despite a fierce crackdown.

The opposition turnout was dwarfed by the huge crowd at the state-run celebrations. Many were bused in to central Azadi, or Freedom, Square to hear an address by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who proclaimed a new success in Iran’s uranium enrichment program and dismissed new U.S. sanctions.

And the massive security clampdown appeared to succeed in preventing protesters from converging into a cohesive demonstrations. Large numbers of riot police, members of the Revolutionary Guard and Basij militiamen, some on motorcycles, deployed in back streets near key squares and major avenues in the capital to move against protesters.

Opposition Web sites spoke of groups of protesters in the hundreds, compared to much larger crowds in past demonstrations

One protester told The Associated Press she had tried to join the demonstrations but soon left in disappointment. “There were 300 of us, maximum 500. Against 10,000 people,” she told an AP reporter outside Iran. She said there were few clashes.

“It means they won and we lost. They defeated us. They were able to gather so many people,” she said. “But this doesn’t mean we have been defeated for good. It’s a defeat for now, today. We need time to regroup.”

Another protester insisted the opposition had come out in significant numbers, but “the problem was that we were not able to gather in one place because they (security forces) were very violent.”

“Maybe people got scared,” he said. “The idea wasn’t to lose or win today … But what is certain, today was not a good day.”

Both spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation by authorities, who have jailed protesters for talking to foreign media.

Authorities banned foreign media in Iran from covering the pro-reform protests. Tehran residents also reported Internet speeds dropping dramatically and e-mail services such as Gmail being blocked in a common government tactic to foil opposition attempts to organize.

Thousands upon thousands marched along the city’s broad avenues toward Azadi Square to celebrate the anniversary of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, according to footage on state TV. There, the massive crowds waved Iranian flags and carried pictures of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic state, and his successor as supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

State buses ferried many to the square. State media touted the turnout as a show of support for the government—though to an extent, celebrations for the revolution cross partisan lines, and many Iranians who oppose Ahmadinejad but support the clerical leadership turn out annually. Among those attending was influential former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, an opposition supporter.

In his nationally televised address in the square, Ahmadinejad proclaimed that Iran has produced its first batch of uranium enriched to a higher level, saying his country will not be bullied by the West into curtailing its nuclear program a day after the U.S. imposed new sanctions.

“The first package of 20 percent fuel was produced and provided to the scientists,” he said, reiterating that Iran was now a “nuclear state.” He did not specify how much uranium had been enriched.

Iran announced on Tuesday that it was starting for the first time to further enrich uranium from around 3 percent purity to 20 percent purity, bringing sharp criticism from the United States and its allies, which accuse Tehran of seeking to develop a nuclear weapon.

Tehran, which denies seeking to build a bomb, has said it wants to further enrich the uranium—which is still substantially below the 90 percent plus level needed for a weapon—to fuel a research reactor for medical isotopes.

Ahmadinejad also criticized President Barack Obama, saying he was following the confrontational line of his predecessor George W. Bush. “We expected Mr. Obama to make changes,” Ahmadinejad said. “But he is losing the chance and not acting properly … Obama’s approach and behavior is disappointing.”

For days ahead of the anniversary celebrations, anti-government Web sites and blogs have called for a major turnout in counterprotests and urged marches to display green emblems or clothes, the opposition’s signature color.

Security forces fired tear gas to disperse a group of protesters who were trying to march toward Azadi Square as they chanted “death to the dictator,” the opposition Web site Kaleme said, reporting an unknown number of arrests. Police and Basijis on motorbikes swept toward central Tehran, where protesters and security forces clashed in several locations, it reported.

Riot police fired paint-filled balls at hundreds of protesters chanting opposition slogans in Sadeqieh Square, about a half-mile (one kilometer) from the anniversary rally, witnesses said.

Security forces also briefly detained Khomeini’s granddaughter and her husband, who are both senior pro-reform politicians, according to the couple’s son, Ali.

The granddaughter, Zahra Eshraghi, and her husband Mohammad Reza Khatami, who is the brother of a former pro-reform president, were held for less than an hour before being released, their son told the AP.

The witnesses spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution from authorities. Foreign media were allowed to cover the ceremonies in the square, including Ahmadinejad’s speech, but there is a ban on covering opposition protests.

Iranian authorities again tried to squeeze off text messaging and Web links in attempts to cripple protest organizers. Internet service was sharply slowed, mobile phone service widely cut and there were repeated disruptions in popular instant messaging services such as Google chat.

Many Internet users said they could not log into their Gmail account, Google Inc.’s e-mail service, since last week.

The opposition claims that Ahmadinejad’s victory in the June 12 election was fraudulent and that the true winner was pro-reform leader Mir Hossein Mousavi. Hundreds of thousands marched in the streets against the government in the weeks after the vote, prompting a massive wave of arrests.

Nevertheless, the opposition has succeeded in continuing to hold regular protests, often timing them to coincide with days of important political or religious significance in attempts to embarrass authorities. The tone of the rallies has shifted from outrage over Ahmadinejad’s re-election to wider calls against the entire Islamic system, including Khamenei.

Tensions have mounted further since the last large-scale marches, in late December, which brought the most violent battles with security riots in months. At least eight people were killed in clashes between protesters and police, and security forces have intensified arrests in the weeks since.

In January, two people who were put on trial alongside opposition politicians and protesters were executed for allegedly plotting to overthrow the state. Authorities have announced that 10 other opposition supporters have also been sentenced to death—a move many believe was aimed at intimidating protesters.

Thanks Breitbart.com

[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Google] [Mister Wong] [MySpace] [Netvouz] [Newsvine] [OnlyWire] [Propeller] [Shoutwire] [Squidoo] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]
Tagged with:
 

Hillary to China: Vote for Iran Sanctions, or Face Gulf Conflagration and Oil Cutoff.

In an interview with Russia Today Webster G. Tarpley talks about the growing US-China confrontation, exposing Hillary Clinton’s blackmail against China. The Iran attack scenario has been revived, but this time as a means of threatening China’s oil supply and strangling that country’s further growth.

For her Jan. 29 speech at the Ecole Militaire in Paris [1], Mrs. Clinton was evidently wearing that stylish new French perfume from the House of Sarkozy called Chantage – meaning blackmail. Mrs. Clinton gloats because she thinks she has the Chinese leadership in a bind.

As she stated, she knows that China increasingly depends on oil from the Gulf. She demanded that China vote for crippling sanctions against Iran in the UN Security Council this month, while Sarkozy — the craziest of all western leaders against Iran — controls the presidency of that body.

For China, approving crippling sanctions against Iran means in all probability the loss of 10% to 12% of its oil imports, the aborting of some $80 billion in development projects by Beijing in Iran, the sacrifice of hundreds of billions of dollars worth of oil which the Chinese have locked in via futures contracts, and, above all, a farewell to the best chance of getting a secure overland oil pipeline far away from the US-UK fleets — the pipeline from Iran via Pakistan into China.

If the Chinese fail to captitulate on this point, Mrs. Clinton darkly hinted, the US would no longer restrain the Israelis, who might then launch their long-threatened air attack on Iran, which the US has emphatically vetoed over the past two years. At that point, the Iranians would try to interdict Gulf maritime traffic and close the strait of Hormuz, meaning that about a third of China’s oil could be cut off. (The other 20% comes from Saudi Arabia.)

The US-UK elite is in a state of collective hysteria about the growth of Chinese economic power. China is now the largest exporter in the world, and officially about to become the second largest economy, passing Japan to challenge the US.

The US is way behind China in fast rail, and will soon fall behind in modern nuclear energy production. China is clearly aiming to put astronauts on the moon, but the Obama-Orszag NASA budget makes clear that the US is going nowhere when it comes to manned space flight. If US elites really want to keep pace, they should put aside their feckless attempts to contain China by subversion, economic warfare, and fomenting conflicts in the Guif and on the India-China border. Match the Chinese programs in nuclear reactors, fast rail, and manned space flight, or prepare for the status of has-been.

But for right now, the Iran attack scenario, which had been pushed to the back burner by the US National Intelligence Estimate of December 2007 — which stated that there was no Iranian nuclear weapons program — is once again operational, this time as a means at striking at China’s oil supply.

Thanks Voltaire Net.

[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Google] [Mister Wong] [MySpace] [Netvouz] [Newsvine] [OnlyWire] [Propeller] [Shoutwire] [Squidoo] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]
Tagged with:
 

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says trans-national Islamic extremist networks pose greater threats to the United States than the nuclear programs of Iran and North Korea.

Clinton says the Obama administration is concerned about connections between non-state groups loyal to al-Qaida with bases in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and North Africa. She was speaking in an interview with U.S. television network CNN, broadcast Sunday.

Clinton says a nuclear-armed Iran or North Korea also pose both a “real or potential threat” to the United States. Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons and says its atomic program is peaceful.

North Korea has tested nuclear weapons and has blocked six-party talks on dismantling that program in return for international aid and other incentives.

Clinton says she does not believe Iran possesses a nuclear weapon, but says Tehran’s behavior is evidence of its intentions. She noted what she called Iran’s “failure” to disclose its uranium enrichment facility near the city of Qom until after it began building the site.

Iran revealed the existence of the previously-secret facility last September, triggering outrage from Western nations who suspect Iran is enriching uranium to develop nuclear weapons.

Clinton also criticized Tehran for refusing to accept what she called a “very reasonable” U.N.-brokered proposal for sending Iran’s low-enriched uranium to Russia and France for processing into fuel. Western nations fear unsupervised enrichment could feed a nuclear weapon program.

The U.S. secretary of state defended the Obama administration’s policy of pursuing engagement with Tehran and Pyongyang to try to resolve disputes about their nuclear programs.

She says North Korea’s lack of response to U.S. engagement efforts persuaded Russia and China to sign on to what she called “very strong” sanctions against Pyongyang that are being enforced worldwide.

Clinton also says the rest of the world is beginning to see Iran’s nuclear program the way Washington sees it, because of what she called “very slow and steady U.S. diplomacy.”

Thanks VA News.

[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Google] [Mister Wong] [MySpace] [Netvouz] [Newsvine] [OnlyWire] [Propeller] [Shoutwire] [Squidoo] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton denied entertaining negotiations between Iran for three U.S. citizens currently being detained.

“As we have said repeatedly, we call on Iran to release all of the American citizens that they have currently detained,” Clinton said. “We believe they’re being unjustly detained and that they should be released without further delay. We also are very committed … to making it clear to the Iranians that they should do so on humanitarian grounds since the detention of our citizens is baseless.”

The three citizens, detained since July 31, were reportedly hiking and crossed an unmarked border into Iran, according to their families.

Clinton is currently pushing the United Nations to approve tougher sanctions on Iran in regards to its nuclear program. Iran claims it is planning to send its low-enriched uranium out of state for enrichment.

Clinton wants Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to be forthright in his intentions.

“If Iran wishes to accept it, we look forward to hearing about it from the [International Atomic Energy Agency] because that’s the appropriate venue for them to file an official response,” Clinton said.

Thanks To The Center.

[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Google] [Mister Wong] [MySpace] [Netvouz] [Newsvine] [OnlyWire] [Propeller] [Shoutwire] [Squidoo] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]

Atleast he properly addressed her as Mrs. Such nice people those Iranians.

Iran: “We Do Not Take Mrs. Clinton’s Remarks Seriously”

Can anyone imagine the regime in Iran not taking a Republican administration seriously?

Ronald Reagan was barely sworn into office when Iran released its hostages.

And here is Iranian Foreign Minister Manuchehr Mottaki dumping on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration. Remember, she came within a few thousand votes of being president in 2008.

Last week, she said: “Iran has provided a continuous stream of threats to intensify its violation of international nuclear norms. Iran’s approach leaves us with little choice than to work with our partners to apply greater pressure in the hope that it will cause Iran to reconsider its rejection of diplomatic efforts.”

The official response from Iran? Talk to the hand.

“Mrs. Clinton’s efforts to take America back to the failed policies of the Bush administration era will not benefit the people or the government of that country,” Mottaki said — according to CNS News.

He also said: “It has been three decades that the Islamic Republic of Iran has been facing the hostile approach of some American officials. Therefore, until the domestic prospect of the White House on Iran-U.S. relations is clarified, we do not take Mrs. Clinton’s remarks seriously.”

Why should Iran take Mrs. Clinton or President Obama seriously? As presidential candidates in 2007 and 2008, they were far from serious about Iran as they dismissed as “saber rattling” President Bush’s attempts to stop Iran’s efforts to build nuclear wea[ponry.

The perpetual campaign is noticed outside America’s borders. Predators always seek the weakest in the herd and they do not get much weaker than Obama and Mrs. Clinton.

**Hillary show them who is weak!

Thanks Daily Mail.

[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Google] [Mister Wong] [MySpace] [Netvouz] [Newsvine] [OnlyWire] [Propeller] [Shoutwire] [Squidoo] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will hold talks on Iran’s nuclear programme while she is in London this week for global meetings on Yemen and Afghanistan, a US official said Wednesday.

Clinton is due to hold bilateral talks with representatives from the six world powers involved in negotiations over Iran’s nuclear ambitions, on the sidelines of discussions on Yemen on Wednesday and Afghanistan on Thursday.

The United States, Germany, China, France, Britain and Russia have been negotiating with Tehran over its nuclear programme amid concerns that it is secretly developing fissile material for nuclear weapons — which Iran denies.

“Iran will be a fairly important element of her trip,” the US official said, adding that Clinton would also raise the issue during bilateral talks in London with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu.

“We’re working on the possible elements of a (UN) Security Council resolution and to take stock of existing Security Council resolutions and what additional actions can be taken to implement those.

“Those conversations are ongoing and they will continue for some time.”

Thanks Cnn.

[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Google] [Mister Wong] [MySpace] [Netvouz] [Newsvine] [OnlyWire] [Propeller] [Shoutwire] [Squidoo] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]
Tagged with:
 

Iran Holds 5 UK Sailors on Yacht!

Iran is holding five British sailors after stopping their racing yacht in the Persian Gulf, the British government said Monday. The move could heighten tensions between Iran and major world powers, including Britain, that are demanding a halt to its nuclear program. Oil prices spiked 2 percent to $77.45 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange as the news broke.

The yacht owned by Sail Bahrain was stopped on its way from the tiny island country to the Gulf city of Dubai on Wednesday when it “may have strayed inadvertently into Iranian waters,” Britain’s Foreign Office said. Sail Bahrain’s Web site identified the yacht as the “Kingdom of Bahrain” and said it had been due to join the Dubai-Muscat Offshore Sailing Race, which was to begin Nov. 26.

The event was to be the boat’s first offshore race, the Web site said, adding that the vessel had been fitted with a satellite tracker.

Attempts to reach representatives of the raceboat’s owner were not immediately successful.

British Foreign Secretary David Miliband said that British officials had been in touch about the matter with their Iranian counterparts for nearly a week. It was not immediately clear why British officials had decided to publicize the case now.

“I hope this issue will soon be resolved,” Miliband said in the brief statement.

The statement added that the crew members “are still in Iran” and were “understood to be safe” but did not specify whether they are and what their legal status is. Calls seeking clarification from Britain’s Foreign Office was not immediately returned.

An Iranian Foreign Ministry official said he was not aware of reports a British yacht had been stopped. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the press.

Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guard has the responsibility for protecting Iranian waters in the Persian Gulf. Officials from the Guard and from the regular navy could not be reached for comment on Monday.

Iran is holding three young Americans who strayed across the border from northern Iraq in July. The U.S. has appealed for their release, saying they were innocent hikers who accidentally crossed into Iran. Tehran has accused them of spying, a sign that they could be put on trial.

Fifteen British military personnel were detained in the Gulf by Iran under disputed circumstances in March 2007. Iran charged them with trespassing in its waters, and the Iranian government televised apologies by some of the captured crew.

All were eventually freed without an apology from Britain, which steadfastly insisted the crew members were taken in Iraqi waters, where they were authorized to be.

The phone rang unanswered at the Iranian Embassy in London.

Iran’s nuclear chief on Monday said U.N. criticism of its nuclear program had pushed his country to retaliate by announcing ambitious plans for more uranium enrichment. With tensions rising over deadlocked negotiations, France said diplomacy was not working and sanctions against Iran were needed.

Thanks Breitbart!

[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Google] [Mister Wong] [MySpace] [Netvouz] [Newsvine] [OnlyWire] [Propeller] [Shoutwire] [Squidoo] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]
Tagged with:
 

Does my gal Hillary know something we don’t know? Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says the U.S. and Russia are on the same page when it comes to dealing with Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

 Clinton did not get any specific pledges to impose tougher sanctions on Iran in her meeting with Russian leaders in Moscow last week.

But in an interview conducted by “Newsweek’s” Russian edition, Clinton said Washington and the Kremlin are in “full agreement” on how to proceed if diplomatic means are not enough to ensure Tehran won’t develop nuclear weapons.

The interview appeared in the German newspaper “Die Welt”.

In it, Clinton said both Russia and the U.S. are committed to using diplomacy in the dispute with Iran.

She added, quote, “if we are not successful, we will consider other steps.” Clinton also praised the Kremlin for abandoning plans to deliver high-grade S300 air defense missiles to Iran.

[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Google] [Mister Wong] [MySpace] [Netvouz] [Newsvine] [OnlyWire] [Propeller] [Shoutwire] [Squidoo] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]
Tagged with:
 

Putin Warns About Sanctions Against Iran

Russian’s former Leader Putin warns that threat of sanctions against Iran could ruin talks on nuclear program.

Really? I think we should talk.

[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Google] [Mister Wong] [MySpace] [Netvouz] [Newsvine] [OnlyWire] [Propeller] [Shoutwire] [Squidoo] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]
Tagged with:
 

professional wordpress themes